Swedish version

Cul De Canard against all rules
By Hans van Klinken

Hans van Klinken ©

(Part one)

  Introduction Cul de Canard (CDC) feathers have risen to worldwide popularity over the last 2 decades. To avoid confusion about their origin I can tell you that the idea using those feathers for fly tying actually came from Central Europe. CDC has been used by a small number of anglers in the Swiss Jura for about a century. Marjan Fratnik from Slovenia popularised them in the early eighties with his publications about the F Fly series. Marjan were inspired after he read Jules Rindlisbachers book. Another great fly tier who is world famous for his superb CDC designs is Marc Petitjean. He kept the Swiss tradition high and design new patterns continuously.

  The last 10 years CDC got a lot of attention, especially, in the UK and USA and suddenly it seems that there are many fly tiers who seems the inventor of the CDC fly now. I guess we all know better. In spite of several well-written stories I still think that some extensive, clear and specified tying techniques can be a great help with tying and fishing CDC patterns. My home country Holland went through a similar phase over 20 years ago, when fishing journalist Kees Ketting popularised CDC. As a result, the Dutch have been experimenting with dressings incorporation the feathers; developing and refining patterns for all types of fishing. In this article about CDC I will tell you something about my way of using CDC. I also will try to give you some detailed information about how I use and work with CDC and how some of my patterns were developed. Finally I also will explain how I fish them.

  I have used CDC for more then fifteen years now and have made loads of different dressings throughout that time. Personally, my use of these flies seems to go in circles: there have been periods or even seasons when I hardly used them and at other moments I used them exclusively. Of course the old original patterns are excellent flies. Nevertheless, I still designed my own patterns. I like to experiment and improve patterns of which I am not fully satisfied. I belief it will be very hard to design a complete new pattern of CDC but some improvements are worthwhile to discuss.

  My different style of fishing needs special patterns. The fact that my distance vision isn't that good and my preference for broken water you can find back in many of my dry fly designs. I also found some very good use for CDC in still water. Today I never will walk beside a river, lake or reservoir without CDC flies in my fly box.

  Floatability and mobility The greatest problem with CDC is that still many people don't know which feather is meant and where exactly it should be taken from. CDC feathers are found around the preen gland of ducks and similar water birds. The CDC from the wild duck seems the most popular. The colour is absolutely incredible and perfect to match many hatches. The feathers are light and naturally coated with the oil from the ducks preen gland. In many stories you can read that the natural oil makes those feathers extremely water-repellent. But further investigations prove that the structure of the feather do the damage.

  In my circle of friends most belief that a combination of the natural oil and feather structure makes this feather so attractive for the fly tier. When I got a very large amount of white CDC of Peking ducks many years ago I started to experiment with dyeing and I actually never had any buoyancy problems with my special designs, so I personally have a lot confidence in the structure theory. Under a loop you can see easily that each feather has a great number of barbules. Those barbules surely aid to buoyancy and are much stronger and more durable then most of us belief they are. I often compare CDC fibres with spider web thread that I use for my different parachute technique. One fibre or winding is very fragile indeed but durability improves with the number of fibres or windings. The fine fibres of a CDC feather are probably the most mobile you ever seen. I think this is another reason what makes this feather so extremely powerful. In the air they will flutter to simulate life in the slightest breeze and for this reason it makes a perfect wing imitation. The wind also has a great impact of the mobility of the floating fly. In or just under the surface remaining fibres highly improve the mobility of the pattern and gives an excellent fly life imitation. Size, shape and colour are the most important facts to imitate insect life but when I started to use CDC and reindeer hair I add mobility without any doubt. This is why I never cut the single barbules away from my fishing flies. So CDC is ideal for both; emergers and dry flies. And there is even more because I know a few fishermen who use CDC for making very mobile nymph too. Its just the way where you believe in the most I guess.

  Although the original CDC flies are good floaters if they are tied well, they are not unsinkable as is so often described. Several of these patterns are tied very sparsely and will definitely become easier waterlogged after catching your first fish. If you don't treat the fly well after hooking a fish the pattern will sink easily especially in rapids and turbulent currents. Amadou helps you to dry the fibres in a reasonable way but some of the floatants will stick the fibres together and will destroy the effectiveness of the pattern because they loose the barbules effect. Therefore I never use any floatant on my CDC. I would point out that with normal or sparse tied CDC flies it is often much easier to tie on a fresh fly than struggle to dry one in use. This finally leads me to use CDC against all rules. But before I will discuss with you about my own patterns which are surely no light dressed ones, you never should misunderstand the thoughts behind the extremely light dressed CDC patterns from the experts and from old days. They can be extremely successful at times and in certain waters. Just like a good Yorkshire 'spider' that loses its power if overdressed. With many CDC flies it is not different. During the years I discovered that some of the old traditional CDC patterns are actually fished better just under the surface film and today I still use them in this 'emerger' role, in preference to them floating on the surface -particularly in still waters.

  My first 'cul de canard' experience While river fishing with small, lightly dressed CDC flies, I often had difficulty spotting them in fast water. As a result, I tended to use them in rivers with a slow current or on still waters. My ideas were transformed; however, following my experiences with a Swedish pattern called the 'Rackelhanen'.

  This 'Rackelhanen" was not only the source of my own L.T. series of flies, but resulted in such tying skills as I have acquired today. The first real breakthrough with my own CDC flies occurred when I tie a Racklehanen mainly from CDC. The natural colour of the CDC was perfect to imitate some dark grey sedges. I named the pattern the Rugged Caddis and it was built up in 4 sections, each includes 4 CDC feathers. A very expensive fly if you have to buy it. The pattern originally possessed a long big wing of at least 16 CDC feathers, mainly because I assumed that the more CDC used, the better the pattern floated. To create the sedge shape I simply cut the feathers to form the wing. How funny it may sound but I mainly used the pattern for catching Atlantic salmon in northern Norway and at that time it was rather good too. However, as I began to experiment with smaller sizes and the length of the wing I reduced the amount of CDC. Then I discovered something surprising. As I shortened the wing, I got better results. In the end I was using a pattern that had a wing of only half the length of the fly body, and it was still floating almost as well as one with a full wing. The fly was difficult to see but because of the aggressive takes I didn't loose too many fish. When I finally started to use smaller hooks and add a hackle the Culard sedge was born!

  This is the dressing I used since 1985.

  The Culard

Hook: Partridge E1A size 18 or E6A size 16.
Thread: Uni-thread 8/0 black.
Body: Herl fibres of a black wing feather of a peacock.
Rib: Extra fine gold wire or yellow pearsalls silk.
Wing: Four CDC feathers pull together and cut 1/2 way the body length.
Hackle: Dark blue dun very fine and much smaller as usual or starling body feather for the types I used below the surface film.

  My tying technique is definitely against all rules. I keep the stiff quill(s) of the CDC feather in the middle and do not take only the soft hackles as many tiers suggest and prefer. I agree with them but I have my own ideas too. Many people said that CDC feathers should never be cut but I still do and must confess that I prefer it above all the other tying methods I have use in the past. After tying in the feathers I trim them. However rebellious, this is the technique that suits me the best. This is the great secret behind all my CDC patterns. Because this technique the stiffer wing dries and "fluffs up' with only one or two false cast and that's my biggest argumentation for it. This is not easy possible when only fibres are used. The filamentous feather tips tend to mat together and are almost impossible to dry by false casting. At least when you are not familiar with CDC! In my patterns the quill provide this. The resultant Culard has become one of my best and favourite flies among my little ones. The pattern is not only an excellent fly in the rivers in Central Europe but also works very well under high summer or low water conditions high up to the North. In still water the fly work great on the surface but sometimes it is even more deadly deeper in the surface. In still waters most of the time I moistened it and fish it as an emerger just under the surface.

  During one of my tying demonstrations I discovered another secret of the Culard just by accident. It happened when I dropped one of the ready-made Culards in a glass of water to show how it floats to the public. Under the wing a nice bubble of air produces a fine halo effect what could be another reason for the unbelievable success of this tiny little CDC pattern.

Tying technique

The Culard

Hans van Klinken ©

Step 1: Wrap the shank in the thread and secure a piece of extra fine gold wire or yellow silk.

Step 2: Tie in some fibres from a black peacock wing feather.

Step 3: Put a some varnish or wingcement on the shank and wind the herl fibres back towards the eye and secure with the gold wire or silk with 7 or 8 windings in the other direction. Be sure there is some space left for tying in the wing and hackle.

Step 4: Tie in 3 or 4 CDC feathers.

Step 5: Tie in a small dark blue dun hackle onto the top of the hook shank.

Step 6: Give only two hackle windings and tie off the fly. Cut off the CDC exactly in the middle of the body.

(To part two)

Text and photos by Hans van Klinken ©
Hans van Klinken website:


To get the best experience of the Magazine it is important that you have the right settings
Here are my recommended settings

Please respect the copyright regulations and do not copy any materials from this or any other of the pages in the Rackelhanen Flyfishing Magazine.

© Mats Sjöstrand 2011

If you have any comments or questions about the Magazine, feel free to contact me.

Mats Sjöstrand, Sweden

Please excuse me if you find misspelled words or any other grammatical errors.
I will be grateful if you contact
me about the errors you find.